Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Welcome Dr. Frank Edwards!


I’m so pleased to announce a new monthly guest blogger to Redwood’s Medical Edge. Dr. Edwards is an emergency medicine physician and will be adding a wealth of information concerning adult ED medicine. I hope you'll take the time to check out his medical thriller, Final Mercy. Welcome, Dr. Edwards!

Cracking Joints

Frank J. Edwards, MD


You’re coming down a set of steps and become distracted, or you’re jogging and don’t see the pothole, or you’re playing soccer, or maybe you’re strolling in the park at dusk, when suddenly an ankle you’ve always taken for granted painfully twists inward and you hear a snap.  Next morning, the outward (lateral) side of your ankle is swollen and bruised, and weight bearing is not a happy experience.  Surely, it is broken.  You even felt the crack.

Ankle injuries are among the most common presenting complaints to emergency departments and urgent care centers.   The ankle is a very flexible hinge-type joint, held together by ligaments and mainly designed to flex upwards and push downwards when we ambulate.  It also allows for inward and outward movements (inversion and eversion) and even some degree of rotation side to side.  Every joint has inherent weaknesses, and the ankle’s Achilles’ heel (so to speak) is excessive inversion.  In other words, it does not take much force to twist the ankle inwards beyond its structural limitations.  Reach down and check it out.   When this happens, the ligaments on the outside (lateral aspect) of the ankle will stretch and tear, or sometimes even rip off a sliver of bone.   By definition, this is a sprain.  However, given enough force, the same mechanism of injury can cause true fractures, sometimes even severe enough to require surgery.

The vast majority of ankle injuries, however, do not involve broken bones and are completely healed within a week.  The question is—when do you need an x-ray?  Fortunately, we have some good research to guide us, something called the Ottawa Ankle Rules (thank the cost-conscious Canadians for this one), which that allows us to predict the likelihood of fracture. 

Basically, the Ottawa Ankle Rules say that: 1) if the patient was able to bear weight right after the injury; 2) if there is no tenderness to pressure over the tip of the fibula (the bone running down the outside of the lower leg); 3) if there is no tenderness over the base of the fifth metatarsal (the outermost of the five long bones in the foot), and; 4) if the ankle is otherwise stable—the chance of a significant fracture is slight. 

When a patient meets these criteria, we can skip the x-ray for now.  Give the injured person a splint and crutches, and save tens of millions of health care dollars a year.  Many health care providers, however, are either unfamiliar with the rules or unwilling to disappoint a patient’s expectations that the visit is incomplete without some radiation.   Especially if the patient “heard it snap.”   However, in my years of ED experience, this sensation usually points toward a sprain.  It is like cracking your knuckles.

*******************************************************************************

Frank Edwards was born and raised in Western New York.  After serving as an Army helicopter pilot in Vietnam, he studied English and Chemistry at UNC Chapel Hill, then received an M.D. from the University of Rochester.  Along the way he earned an MFA in Writing at Warren Wilson College.  He continues to write, teach and practice emergency medicine. More information can be found at http://www.frankjedwards.com/.

Monday, July 4, 2011

Firework Injuries

What kind of nurse would I be, really, if I didn't post something about firework injuries on July 4th?



This is one of those time specific things ED's deal with. One thing you may not know is that in most ED's I've worked, the local fire department likes us to keep track of firecracker related injuries and submit that data to them. It's generally age and type of injury to avoid violating the patient's HIPPA rights.

This link is for firework safety: http://www.cpsc.gov/info/fireworks/

Firework related injuries: http://www.traumaf.org/featured/6-29-04fireworks.html

Stats of firework injures: http://www.usfa.dhs.gov/citizens/focus/fireworks.shtm

So, please, enjoy the holiday. But, stay safe and legal! I'll be working and I don't want to see you in the ED.

Jordyn

Friday, July 1, 2011

Western Medicine Circa 1890: Part 1/4

I'm very pleased to host Lacy Williams as a guest blogger this month. She is doing a four-part Friday series on western medicine during the 1890's. Lacy has developed a great contest so check yesterday's post for details. Though, I'm not sure I'm pleased with her reading the end of books first. I might have to chat with her about that....

Welcome Lacy!

Just want to say a quick thank you to Jordyn for hosting me on her blog this month! I’m really excited to be here and I plan to share some book excerpts and do a book giveaway that you won’t find anywhere else, so stay tuned the next few Fridays.

 I did a considerable amount of historical medical research for my novel, Marrying Miss Marshal, mostly because it seemed my heroine (a town marshal) kept getting into scrapes! Some of the basic research indicated that folks in the Wild West didn’t always have access to a doctor, mostly because there was a shortage of doctors in the less-populated areas. So they tended to doctor themselves. My heroine, Danna Carpenter, is the widow of the former town marshal and often had to doctor him up, so she does have some experience with tending injuries. She also grew up on a ranch, so in my mind, she would have also seen treatment of animals, which was often done by common sense.

DISLOCATED SHOULDER

In the first chapter of Marrying Miss Marshal, the hero falls down a ravine and dislocates his shoulder. One of the sources I used in my research, The Modern Family Physician (1915), gives two methods for treating a dislocated shoulder. One, Stimson’s method, wouldn’t work for my story because both hero and heroine are stranded outdoors in the dark. Here’s an excerpt that tells about the second method of treatment:

The more ordinary method consists in putting the patient on his back on the floor, the operator also sitting on the floor with his stockinged foot against the patient's side under the armpit of the injured shoulder and grasping the injured arm at the elbow, he pulls the arm directly outward (i. e., with the arm at right angles with the body) and away from the trunk. An assistant may at the same time aid by lifting the head of the arm bone upward with his fingers in the patient's armpit and his thumbs over the injured shoulder.

Although this isn’t exactly how it happened in Marrying Miss Marshal, this information is what I based my scene on. My brother-in-law (shout out to Ben!) dislocated his shoulder several times during high school, and had either a family member or friend put the joint back into place on the spot, so I know it’s possible for a layman to do it.

How do you think my scene turned out?

From Marrying Miss Marshal chapter 1:

When she reached him, Danna knelt at his head and studied the man. His hat had slipped to one side, and his sweat-matted hair was dark next to his fair skin.

"Mister, you've sure got a way of getting into some pretty good scrapes," she muttered. She probed his scalp and neck gently with her fingertips, searching for injury. Though obscured by a few days growth stubble, he had a strong jawline.

He gasped when her palm brushed his right shoulder. Keeping her touch as light as she could, Danna ran her fingers over the arm and shoulder, and he moaned again. "Hurts."

"I know. Looks like you've knocked it out of place." She prodded his torso and legs, but found no additional trauma. She did find a gun belt and weapon at his hip, but ignored it for now. "I can reset it for you."

She smoothed a hand over his forehead, as if she was comforting her almost-niece, Ellie. "Tell me your name."

"Chas." A breath. "O'Grady."

She filed the name away. O'Grady sounded Irish. She nodded absently and murmured, "I'm Danna Carpenter," as she considered the best way to get his shoulder back into the socket. "What brings you to Wyoming?"

"Job."

"Not cattle."

One corner of his mouth quirked upward. "How'd you know?"

"Lawyer?"

He snorted a laugh, then grimaced as if the movement pained him.

"Railroad surveyor?" she guessed, and gave a mighty tug.

O'Grady's upper arm and the shoulder slid into place with an audible click. She was impressed when he didn't cry out, just rolled his head and looked at her with those blue eyes.

"Thanks. You're a doll."

Then he passed out.

Copyright © 2011 by Lacy Williams. Permission to reproduce text granted by Harlequin Books.

REFERENCE:
The Modern Family Physician (1915) is available in the public domain on Googlebooks:
Volume 1
Volume 2 (dislocated shoulder information starts on page 412 of this volume)

***********************************************************************


As a child, Lacy Williams wanted to become a veterinarian “when she grew up”. However, the sight of blood often made her squeamish so she gave up that dream before her teen years. As a college student, Lacy was a physical therapy major for approximately two weeks—until she found out she’d have to take a cadaver lab to complete that degree plan. As a writer, Lacy has finally found a way she can handle blood and gore—fictionally. 

A wife and mom from Oklahoma, Lacy is a member of the American Christian Fiction Writers and is active in her local chapter, including a mentorship program she helped to start. She writes to give her readers happily-ever-afters guaranteed and mostly reads the end of the book first. You can find out more about Lacy at her website http://www.lacywilliams.net/. She is also active on Facebook (www.facebook.com/lacywilliamsbooks) and Twitter (www.twitter.com/lacy_williams).

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Medical Question: 1950's Coroner


April asks: For a grad assignment, I have to come up with murder mystery plot line.  I have the general plot line down, but I'm wondering how efficient an autopsy in the 1950s would be?
I need the victim to be poisoned, most likely by a relatively common plant--probably a daffodil, yew, or Wild Cherries (those are my top three choices at the moment).  However, I have no idea how much or what kind of poisons would have been detectable by a small-town, 1950's coroner.
Jordyn says:  First thing, is a medical examiner and coroner are very different. A medical examiner is a trained physician (the one who does the autopsy) and the coroner is an elected official to decide how an investigation should proceed. For instance, if the coroner feels the cause of death does not involve a crime, there may not even be an autopsy.


Yew Plant
The second thing you need to determine is when tests for toxicology/poisons came about: "Screening tests, such as radio immunoassay, enzyme immunoassay and thin-layer chromatography are often very sensitive, but not very specific. Because they are very sensitive, they will very likely detect the chemical/poison if it is, indeed, present in the sample. Unfortunately, because they lack specificity, they are given to false-positives – mistaking a substance with a similar chemical make-up for the suspected poison. Unless the results of these screening tests are confirmed with a reliable testing methodology, such as gas-chromatography/mass-spectrometry, the results of these screening tests do not satisfy the evidentiary standards for admissibility.”
When I did a little searching, some of these tests were not developed until the 1950's and 1960's. So, for them to be widely used would take some years. If you want to be very specific in your ms, you need to research when each of these tests were developed for forensic use. For example, google "development of forensic radio immnoassay". That will give you a timeline for when they may have been able to detect your chosen poisons on autopsy. I did link you to some forensic timelines below--- there are a few of these tests mentioned.
I think the easiest route for you would be this: This small town has a coroner who doesn't suspect anything criminal is going on. This is still very common today because a coroner may have absolutely little or no medical training and probably no forensic training. Then, maybe based on the victim's symptoms before death, the very smart local doctor begins to think someone is poisoning these people. This sets up conflict which is always a must. I would research the symptoms people have when they ingest the items you have listed. Then, maybe this local doctor can push the coroner into having a fancy, big-town ME do an autopsy.
3. http://jimfisher.edinboro.edu/forensics/fire/tox.html: forensic toxicology (poisonings)
Hope this helps and gives you some direction.